Subject | Re: SMP |
---|---|
Author | Bernard Devlin |
Post date | 2004-02-24T04:46:12Z |
Fikret,
People can probably offer more help if you can provide more detail.
Since the SS cache is shared between connections, then it might help,
especially in a web app (for example) if there is shared data between
clients. However, if your clients access patterns are not likely to
share data (and given you have so much RAM) it might be better if they
are all having their own cache per connection.
As with many servers, there is no config option for GO_FASTER=YES.
Please let people here know more details of what is slow.
Should I try SS on
People can probably offer more help if you can provide more detail.
Since the SS cache is shared between connections, then it might help,
especially in a web app (for example) if there is shared data between
clients. However, if your clients access patterns are not likely to
share data (and given you have so much RAM) it might be better if they
are all having their own cache per connection.
As with many servers, there is no config option for GO_FASTER=YES.
Please let people here know more details of what is slow.
Should I try SS on
> that box?
> BTW, server is IBM xSeries 255 dual Xeon MP 2.8 GHz. with 10 Gig RAM,
> around 1Tb SCSI disk. Right now I am running Firebird CS on it. Will
> SS be faster? Also, I would appreciate if anyone can help me to get
> most of firebird on this machine. Can anyone provide me with some
> tips and tricks setting firebird CS (or SS if it will be faster)?
>
> >
> > /hb
>
> Best regards
> Fikret Hasovic