Subject | Re: SMP |
---|---|
Author | Fikret Hasovic |
Post date | 2004-02-23T10:26:25Z |
Hi.
that. That's why I installed CS on my linux box. Should I try SS on
that box?
BTW, server is IBM xSeries 255 dual Xeon MP 2.8 GHz. with 10 Gig RAM,
around 1Tb SCSI disk. Right now I am running Firebird CS on it. Will
SS be faster? Also, I would appreciate if anyone can help me to get
most of firebird on this machine. Can anyone provide me with some
tips and tricks setting firebird CS (or SS if it will be faster)?
Fikret Hasovic
TAMP R&D Team
FirebirdSQL Foundation member.
- Join today at http://www.firebirdsql.org/ff/foundation
JEDI VCS contributor
http://jedivcs.sourceforge.net/
> 1. SS on Windows - no change. CPU affinity needs to be set to asingle
> CPU, Hyperthreading needs to be disabled at BIOS level on mosthardware
> that has HT. WRT HT, best to try it - if you observe the see-saweffect
> then HT needs turning off. Also applies to Embedded server.I know that.
>
> 2. CS on Windows - no problem. The OS takes care of it. Possiblysimilar
> for HT.way or the
>
> 3. CS or SS on Linux - no problems with SMP, I haven't heard one
> other about HT - again, best to test for yourself. I readsomewhere on one
> of the lists that a lot of Linuxen play up with HT, but this wasone guy,
> one machine, many distros - so who can tell?SS doesn't have problems with SMP systems on linux? I didn't knew
that. That's why I installed CS on my linux box. Should I try SS on
that box?
BTW, server is IBM xSeries 255 dual Xeon MP 2.8 GHz. with 10 Gig RAM,
around 1Tb SCSI disk. Right now I am running Firebird CS on it. Will
SS be faster? Also, I would appreciate if anyone can help me to get
most of firebird on this machine. Can anyone provide me with some
tips and tricks setting firebird CS (or SS if it will be faster)?
>Best regards
> /hb
Fikret Hasovic
TAMP R&D Team
FirebirdSQL Foundation member.
- Join today at http://www.firebirdsql.org/ff/foundation
JEDI VCS contributor
http://jedivcs.sourceforge.net/