Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Request for FB 1.5 |
---|---|
Author | Olivier Mascia |
Post date | 2004-02-19T08:22:52Z |
On 19/02/2004 1:26 GMT+1, clementdoss wrote:
Description field presence or not as a passport for "you can run on my
server or not" ! I wonder if I need to laugh or cry ?!
to the already installed service. Or update instsvc source code for
doing so. I'll take care of this soon, if no other developer here sees a
reason not to do it. But you can for sure fix this for yourself without
delay.
--
Best Regards,
Olivier Mascia
> Recently I had a huge problem because of a security decision made byThat's what I call a really dumb, stupid, ______, security measure.
> some of my customers.
> Due to security risk they will remove all the services with blank
> description(only from the server machine).
> They want to keep a report to follow the services activities.
> And Firebird (at least 1.0.x) has a blank service description.
>
> Well, the network administrator, from one of them, is running "some
> program" that disables all the services that do not have a
> description, thus, causing Firebird and FireBird guardian to be
> disabled during the day, and of course, stoping all my applications.
Description field presence or not as a passport for "you can run on my
server or not" ! I wonder if I need to laugh or cry ?!
> 1) Is there a way to "insert" a description for both FirebirdOf course. Just write a piece of program that add a service description
> services, without breaking any license agreement?
to the already installed service. Or update instsvc source code for
doing so. I'll take care of this soon, if no other developer here sees a
reason not to do it. But you can for sure fix this for yourself without
delay.
--
Best Regards,
Olivier Mascia