Subject | Re: problem using backup (Classic vs SuperServer) |
---|---|
Author | Fikret Hasovic |
Post date | 2004-02-04T15:55:04Z |
Hi.
enterprise server 8), no MS for server...
Fikret Hasovic
TAMP R&D team
>SuperServer (On
> I have tested it, and Classic Server is far much faster than
> Windows 2K Server, and I guess on XP & NT too, but i doubt on95/98/Me).
>I have never tested it... Also, my plan is to use Linux box (Suse
enterprise server 8), no MS for server...
> Also, you can use more than 1 CPU on Classic, but you will needmuch more
> RAM. Basicly, proper Microsofts OS (NT & 2K) will perform muchbetter with
> multiple "instances" of a program rather than a simple Applicationwith
> "Internal Threading". On the other hand, SuperServer will save lotsof money
> in terms of RAM and CPU.Yes. Thank you.
>
> I hope this helps,Best regards
> Cheers,
> Fabian.
Fikret Hasovic
TAMP R&D team