I don't necessarily consider being "Borland like" to be a good thing in
all cases. I have come to prefer the JDBC model to the Borland Dataset
model because it is more scalable and, apparently, it is easier to make
the database support classes reliable. :o)

On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 14:56, Aage Johansen wrote:
>
> David Johnson wrote:
>
> > ...
> > IBO was the least Borland-like of the component sets I tested, but was
> > the most reliable and had the fastest performance.
> > ...
>
>
> "Least Borland-like" if you compare IBO to IBX. Converting from BDE to IBO
> was quite easy - the mindset of the BDE could _to some extent_ be carried
> over to IBO.
> Then, you could say "IBO was the least Borland-like" if you compare to the
> BDE's functionality, speed, dependability ...
>
>
> --
> Aage J.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>