Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Watchout for long aliases... |
---|---|
Author | Lester Caine |
Post date | 2004-11-06T09:24:30Z |
Valentin Samko wrote:
acceptable. Not sure that it needs to be that big, but since the system
table structure will need to be re-written if the limit is changed
taking it to the limit would seem sensible.
--
Lester Caine
-----------------------------
L.S.Caine Electronic Services
>>>While we all know there's a 32 character limit on field names,The field size in the system tables is 31 characters - hence the limit
>
> HB> You meant 31-character, right?
>
>>>it silently applies to aliases as well...
> Is there any chance that this restriction will be removed in FireBirdThe SQL2003 spec is up to 64 characters - with anything less also
> 2, or future versions, or at least increased to something more
> reasonable?
acceptable. Not sure that it needs to be that big, but since the system
table structure will need to be re-written if the limit is changed
taking it to the limit would seem sensible.
--
Lester Caine
-----------------------------
L.S.Caine Electronic Services