Subject | RE: [firebird-support] Firebird UDF Compilation environments on Windows and Linux. |
---|---|
Author | Helen Borrie |
Post date | 2004-10-22T15:06Z |
OK, guys, move this out to firebird-general, please. It is very very very
off-topic.
thks
^heLen
At 12:43 AM 23/10/2004 +1000, you wrote:
off-topic.
thks
^heLen
At 12:43 AM 23/10/2004 +1000, you wrote:
>Hi Martijn
>
>You are (by observation) an exception to the *young* programmers I mentioned
>as being *trapped* in their current programming language environment. The
>point I am trying to make (hopefully positive), is that just because *I* am
>a Pascal programmer I cannot learn or use code written in C++ (for example)
>is a *cop out* (hopefully that term is internationally understood?).
>
>I am NOT trying to be a *smart ass*, the only point I am trying to get
>across is that "don't dismiss example code etc because it is written in a
>different language to the one you are familiar with because it may be a
>better example than code written in the language I am familiar with"
>
>Look, I don't know about you, but I (before I actually write the code),
>write pseudo code (language less) on what I wish to perform. I then convert
>this into the actual language which I am about to compile. If this sequence
>is observed then as long as the syntax of the target language is adhered to,
>then compilation should happen without errors.
>
>So, in retrospect, I guess I am saying that programmers should write their
>code in *pseudo code* then key it in as the target language requires.
>
>If the above is adhered to, then I still cannot understand anyone saying, "I
>only code in XXXXXX!"
>
>Regards
>
>Ken A Galbraith
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>