Well, I think any distribuition may be the best, depends of user.
We use Conectiva Linux 10, this distribution is better than fedora core
or other distributions in performance, and we can make more with the
same hardware, you can see it at "www.conectiva.com.br", try it, i
really think you will be satisfied with it.

Max

On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 23:15, R. S. Patil wrote:
> Dear Friends,
>
> Till Date we have been using Firebird on
> W9x (For Development) and Suse 7.2 -> 8.2 (Production)
>
> Recently one of our Prospectives (who is keen on having
> Linux based FB as DB Server) H/W vendor has indicated
> his inability in Installing/Supporting Suse but he can
> Install/Support RH on his server. Till date we don't have
> any experience with RH installation or supporting FB on
> RH server.
>
> Can somebody guide us whether is it advisable to have
> RH 8.0 on Server or shall we insist on Suse 8.2 which
> has prooven record.
>
> Similarly we are using FreeUDFLib
> UDFs. How shall we compile same on RH what are the
> RPMs required for that.
>
> BTW which distro has been in use for development and
> testing of FB. If it is RH then I feel there will not be
> any problems in shifting from Suse to RH.
>
> Pl Share with me ur valuable opinions regarding
> FB on RH 8.0 onwards
>
> Thanks and Best regards.
>
> R. S. Patil
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
> click here
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> * To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/firebird-support/
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> firebird-support-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
>