> >you can't go back via gbak.
>
> Alan,
>
> Why do you say that? Unless they've made some changes to the
> database - e.g. using constraint indexes with custom names - I
> would expect the 6.2 gbak to recreate a perfectly fine 6.2
> database. Have I forgotten something?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ann

yes - I suppose I was assuming that further work would be done on the db in
1.5 and I assumed that the old gbak+old client would not be a good mix. I've
never done it and thought it bad practice.
Alan