Subject | RE: [firebird-support] Archive expiriences |
---|---|
Author | Planles |
Post date | 2004-10-14T10:06:55Z |
> So my answer is : why, when running a RDBMS, do you need toBasically just because of hidding old orders from user.
> archive at all?
> We run at about
> 30 000 transactions per month in the log table, and we have no problems
> with that kind of
> transaction density.
So you suggest, that I should keep ALL orders in one table and omit
accessable one with select statement e.g.
select * from orders where OrderDate < some_date ?
Regards,
Primoz
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >Could you share with we, what expiriences do you have with
> making archives
> >of some table data ?
> >
> >Let me be more specific:
> >in an application with clients, orders, employee an similar stuf
> there can
> >be a few houndreeds or more orders each year.
> >Normaly we do not need to have all orders in actual orders table, but we
> >should be able to check any old order at any time.
> >So old orders should be transfered to another table with the same data
> >structure as actual one.
> >
> >What approach do you prefer ?
> >Make just a new table within same database (fdb file) or is
> better and more
> >secure to create separate database (fdb file) just for archive.
> >
> >I don't have in mind backing up my data, but exclude old orders
> from actual
> >orders table.
> >
> >
> >Regards,
> >Primoz
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>