Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: OT: M$Navision & Firebird |
---|---|
Author | Daniel Rail |
Post date | 2004-10-13T16:09:47Z |
Hi,
At October 13, 2004, 12:39, Carlos Macao wrote:
extensions prior to Firebird. And, that doesn't mean that we have to
change, because there are already a lot of applications that use the
same extension.
http://www.accountingsoftwareadvisor.com/navision/tourattain.htm
The Navision Attain SQL Server is based on C/SIDE database, which by
the brief functional description, works in a similar way as Firebird.
But, C/SIDE has been in existence since before 1996(which is the
earliest date that I found in the article above) and it was working
like that since then, at least.
--
Best regards,
Daniel Rail
Senior System Engineer
ACCRA Group Inc. (www.accra.ca)
ACCRA Med Software Inc. (www.filopto.com)
At October 13, 2004, 12:39, Carlos Macao wrote:
> It's really a undesirable coincidence, even the backup file extensionI agree that it is. But, Navision seem to have been using the
> it's equal: http://www.fileformat.info/ext/f.htm
extensions prior to Firebird. And, that doesn't mean that we have to
change, because there are already a lot of applications that use the
same extension.
> Some info about Navision Attain SQL Server:And, here's even more:
> http://www.accountingsoftwareadvisor.com/navision/techattain.htm
http://www.accountingsoftwareadvisor.com/navision/tourattain.htm
The Navision Attain SQL Server is based on C/SIDE database, which by
the brief functional description, works in a similar way as Firebird.
But, C/SIDE has been in existence since before 1996(which is the
earliest date that I found in the article above) and it was working
like that since then, at least.
--
Best regards,
Daniel Rail
Senior System Engineer
ACCRA Group Inc. (www.accra.ca)
ACCRA Med Software Inc. (www.filopto.com)