Subject | Re: [firebird-support] On the fly data compression... |
---|---|
Author | Artur Anjos |
Post date | 2004-01-21T10:08:14Z |
Hi Jonathan,
protocol, so you will not see any improvement on Firebird 1.5, just in 2.0.
Dmitry already implemented a new protocol in version 2.0.
you will not see it in version 2.0.
The global opinion is that you can use another product to do this job, so
let the people who know about that data compression/encryption (like
ZeBeDee) do there job. :-)
I know it will be more simple, but I think this aproach it's more flexible.
If you are on fast networks you will not need this in 90% of the cases.
was a client problem, so maybe you can try - at your own risk - to use fb
client 1.5 with 1.0 server, since the client should be backward compatible).
I already talked about the new protocol.
I hope this helps,
Artur
> 1) Why does preparation of a query require a lot of communication overYes, that's the big problem. This couldn't be solved without changing the
> the wire (which makes it the slowest of part of executing a query over a
> slow connection)?
> Everyone so far has simply told me that since it's a server-side
> operation, it shouldn't be affected by the speed of the network
> connection. I fully agree, but unfortunately, my experience shows that
> in practice, this is not the case. Has this been fixed in FireBird 1.5 ?
protocol, so you will not see any improvement on Firebird 1.5, just in 2.0.
Dmitry already implemented a new protocol in version 2.0.
> 2) Are there any plans for integrating an on the fly dataNo. It was discussed to use some kind of plug-ins in the future, but I think
> compression/encryption system (like Zebedee) into FireBird? (snip)
you will not see it in version 2.0.
The global opinion is that you can use another product to do this job, so
let the people who know about that data compression/encryption (like
ZeBeDee) do there job. :-)
I know it will be more simple, but I think this aproach it's more flexible.
If you are on fast networks you will not need this in 90% of the cases.
> 3) Have there been / are there going to be any improvements in the"Sending varchars with trailing spaces" was fixed already in version 1.5 (it
> communication protocol itself in order to eliminate unnecessary chatter
> (for example, sending varchars with trailing spaces)? I've heard that
> there had been some work done in this direction in Interbase 6.5.
was a client problem, so maybe you can try - at your own risk - to use fb
client 1.5 with 1.0 server, since the client should be backward compatible).
I already talked about the new protocol.
I hope this helps,
Artur