Subject | Re: Re: [firebird-support] Possible bug in RC8 -Finding out size of database through code from client |
---|---|
Author | GOVINDKRISHNA |
Post date | 2004-01-14T05:47:24Z |
>This is fair enough. But the behaviour is not consistent across single file and
>From : Helen Borrie <helebor@...>
>To : firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
>Date : 14/01/2004 9:56:04 AM
>Subject : Re: [firebird-support] Possible bug in RC8 -Finding out size of database through code from client
>
>
>The figures you are collecting are the specifications. The algorithm you
>are using will calculate the size at which a file is treated as
>"full".
multi-file databases. In single file the algorithm returns used space and in
multi- file it returns size when full. That is why I feel this is a bug.
>This aint MSSQL server - the disk space isn't pre-allocated. WhenWe are trying for REALLY REALLY zero admin. So I want to do all this without
>the server needs more space, it will take more. Adding a file merely says
>"Use up to this much space for this file." It really doesn't make sense to
>limit the file size to 1000 pages.
>
>If you want to know the actual size of a file, take the database off line
>and look at what the OS reports. It's not good doing this while someone is
>logged in because the OS won't update the sizes until the files are
>actually closed (on Windows, at least).
>
>/helen
the the end user having to look at the file size etc. Unfortunately my
application may or may not have file system access to the database machine, so
I really would like to do this through the firebird api.
So maybe if it is not a bug maybe it could be treated as a feature request. How
can I log this in as a feature request.
gk
>>>This mail is created in Hamsa www.jlmatrix.com <<<