Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Is Firebird a hoax? |
---|---|
Author | Roque |
Post date | 2004-01-09T12:07:08Z |
Hi,
:. I've never seen such a flexible database manager before. I had use it
inside Windows 95/98/2000/XP and mostly in many flavors of Linux, supporting
a variety of Glib and Kernel versions without problems. Firebird gives
everything it promises. Please, do research a little bit more. Of course,
there is still developing in progress and problems to sort it out.
Regards.
Roque
:. I've never seen such a flexible database manager before. I had use it
inside Windows 95/98/2000/XP and mostly in many flavors of Linux, supporting
a variety of Glib and Kernel versions without problems. Firebird gives
everything it promises. Please, do research a little bit more. Of course,
there is still developing in progress and problems to sort it out.
Regards.
Roque
----- Original Message -----
From: "Diego - DM2" <diego@...>
To: <firebird-support@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 7:21 AM
Subject: Re: [firebird-support] Is Firebird a hoax?
> I use firebirs 1.0.3 in windows 2k, 2k3 and 2k3 web edition in my work
> place, and in XP at home.....and don't have any problem with it!
>
> Diego
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "chiaraprc" <chiaraprc@...>
> To: <firebird-support@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 8:31 PM
> Subject: [firebird-support] Is Firebird a hoax?
>
>
> > Hi all,
> > Some weeks ago a friend of mine told me about
> > Firebird, so I am testing it in my lab, I am reading
> > some "exiting" news on ibphoenix or on firebirdsql.com
> > but I am a little confused:
> >
> > The only stable release of Firebird, (1.03) is pratically
> > inusable on newest PC's, HT is not supported, W2k3 is
> > not supported, latest XP are not supported, W2k SP4
> > are not supported, ODBC are inusable, i need to install
> > windows95 on my old Pentium to use Firebird???
> > I toke a look at Firebird 1.5
> > is it a real release?? the rc8 seem to introduce more bug
> > the any other previous relase since 1976: a serious
> > security bug, a computed fields bug, an installer bug,
> > the 1.5 are in this state since a year, (as stated in
> > developer ng) but all are "exiting" building FB2, is
> > Firebird a lab for gurus? or it is a product? Is Firebird
> > a choice today? or I need to search some thing more reliable?
> > When we can aspect a runnable Firebird? As in firebridsql.com
> > "relational database for the new millenium" starting from 2000?
> >
> > Best Regards
> >
> > Chiara Percioli
> > Software Architect
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> > To visit your group on the web, go to:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/firebird-support/
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > firebird-support-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/firebird-support/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> firebird-support-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>