Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Design issue |
---|---|
Author | Juan Pedro López Sáez |
Post date | 2003-08-19T07:53:55Z |
Hello,
the same tables for every client.
--
Juan Pedro López Sáez
ALTIRIA TIC, S.L.L.
www.altiria.com
> Hello Juan,You are right.
>
> Monday, August 18, 2003, 8:05:38 PM, you wrote:
>
> JPLS> - Some tables, commons to every client, exist just once.
>
> JPLS> - Some other tables exist in a per client basis. Every new client has
> JPLS> his "private" tables. These tables are selected by the name. They all
> JPLS> share the same name but a little suffix which identifies everyone from
> JPLS> the others (ie: there is a GROUPS_0 table for a client and a GROUPS_1
> JPLS> for another client).
>
> And I guess the structure of each of those GROUPS_0, GROUPS_1, ...
> tables is identical ?
>
> Well, so having them all in a single table looks a bit more appealingThank you for your comments, possibly I should modify my design to use
> isn't it ? What will you do if you have two thousands clients and need
> 3 tables per client ? Have a DB with six thousands tables ? I think
> this idea goes against any common usage in the db world.
the same tables for every client.
--
Juan Pedro López Sáez
ALTIRIA TIC, S.L.L.
www.altiria.com