Daniel Rail wrote:

> Hi,
>
> At July 25, 2003, 15:50, Oliver Brockmann wrote:
>
>
>>Aage Johansen wrote:
>
>
>>>On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 13:29:27 +0000 (UTC), obrockmann wrote:
>>>
>>> > We had a firebird server running smoothly on a windows 2000 server
>>> > machine with 2 xeon cpus. this machine was upgraded to windows 2003.
>>> > however the time it takes to attach to a database has increased by a
>>> > factor of 3 and has become unstandable for the users.
>>> > ...
>>>
>>>
>>>Why did you move from Win2000 to Win2003 ?
>>>
>>
>>because we need it's terminal server features in order to
>>provide access to the application on the server. users
>>log on via the terminal services and work locally.
>
>
> Windows 2000 Server already has terminal services. All you need is
> the proper licences and set it up. We have clients that use it.
> Unless, there's a benefit with the Win2003 terminal services compared
> to the Win2000 terminal services.
>

Yes that is true. But we found that stability and performance of the
services were not appropriate for our production environment. the
windows 2003 terminal services are.