Subject | Re: [ib-support] Re: Time sharing |
---|---|
Author | Milan Babuskov |
Post date | 2003-05-21T06:37:58Z |
Alexander V.Nevsky wrote:
any special things we need to look into if we replace SS with Classic?
Another question: Can I run both SS and CS on same machine?
I would keep using SS for OLTP (i.e entering new data), and use CS
(perhaps on different TCP port) for reports.
TIA
P.S. I use Linux.
--
Milan Babuskov
http://fbexport.sourceforge.net
> --- In ib-support@yahoogroups.com, "Valdir Stiebe Junior"I have the same problem as Valdir, so I will try Classic too. Are there
> <valdir@p...> wrote:
>
>> user? The problem is that i have 30 users connected at my GDB. When one
>> of them start a huge report (huge in computation, not in fetch volume)
>> the others 29 users stay waiting, because the report needs at least 20
>> minutes to execute.
>
> Valdir, try Classic server and you'll be pleasantly surprised :)
> What about future - there are plans to improve both Classic and Super
> in this sense, it is main aim for future 2.0 version. Don't know which
> have more priority and can't forecast schedule of this project.
any special things we need to look into if we replace SS with Classic?
Another question: Can I run both SS and CS on same machine?
I would keep using SS for OLTP (i.e entering new data), and use CS
(perhaps on different TCP port) for reports.
TIA
P.S. I use Linux.
--
Milan Babuskov
http://fbexport.sourceforge.net