Subject | Re: [ib-support] To be or not to be ? Save image in blob. |
---|---|
Author | Lester Caine |
Post date | 2003-05-15T05:32:11Z |
> I think this is an old question. But since firebird sql undergo manyPersonally I'm still keeping the data outside the database
> changes, may be the answer would have difference.
>
> I have an web application with about 100,000 images average 50KB. What is
> the performance difference for save the images in blob or in a file system
> directory ?
>
> Sorry, it is my first web application so I have no experience on this area.
> I think it is more easy to get the image if save in a directory. Save the
> images in db is more easy to manage.
>
> Any comment is welcome.
in these cases. Just store the file name internally. But
with 1.5 reaching maturity perhaps now is the time to look
at the alternatives again <g>
I've started using FreeVCS for version control and this
stores the sourcecode in compressed files in BLOBs.
Performance does not seem to be a problem even on 1.0, but
then the activity is quite low, with only me accessing it <bg>
--
Lester Caine
-----------------------------
L.S.Caine Electronic Services