| Subject | Re: [ib-support] Linux file system |
|---|---|
| Author | paul |
| Post date | 2003-05-06T08:07:03Z |
On Monday 05 May 2003 21:29, A6-CMO Philippe Makowski wrote:
is probably not recommended. It is optimised for small files.
ext3 will give faster recovery times over ext2, especially if you have to
reboot frequently.
You might want to take a look at XFS (I think that's the one). It was
developed by Silicon Graphics for large files, although the large files they
use were video, not databases.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird and InterBase
> wich linux file system is better for firebird databases ?I haven't done any serious investigation into this but I'd say that ReiferFS
> ext2, ext3, ReiserFS ?
>
is probably not recommended. It is optimised for small files.
ext3 will give faster recovery times over ext2, especially if you have to
reboot frequently.
You might want to take a look at XFS (I think that's the one). It was
developed by Silicon Graphics for large files, although the large files they
use were video, not databases.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird and InterBase