Subject | RE: [ib-support] Re: IB/FB and MySQL at low bandwidth connection |
---|---|
Author | Alan McDonald |
Post date | 2003-03-24T10:10:47Z |
do you mean packet size?
if so then I don't think so
Alan
-----Original Message-----
From: ilizaran [mailto:nacho@...-andalucia.es]
Sent: Monday, 24 March 2003 9:00 PM
To: ib-support@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [ib-support] Re: IB/FB and MySQL at low bandwidth
connection
Is posible change pakage size? I can't use TCP_REMOTE_BUFFER
parameter to get better performance ...
Thanks
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
if so then I don't think so
Alan
-----Original Message-----
From: ilizaran [mailto:nacho@...-andalucia.es]
Sent: Monday, 24 March 2003 9:00 PM
To: ib-support@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [ib-support] Re: IB/FB and MySQL at low bandwidth
connection
Is posible change pakage size? I can't use TCP_REMOTE_BUFFER
parameter to get better performance ...
Thanks
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 20/03/2003 at 15:14 Alan McDonald wrote:
I would imagine that if you backup without asking for verbose output
(i.e. a
memo feed) there will not be any traffic back to the client...
As for the other times... maybe you have a point here
Alan
-----Original Message-----
From: nvitya [mailto:viktor.nagy@...]
Sent: Thursday, 20 March 2003 3:08 PM
To: ib-support@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [ib-support] Re: IB/FB and MySQL at low bandwidth connection
> TCPDUMP ANALYSIS OF INTERBASE QUERY RUN:
> ----------------------------------------
>
> query = "select count(*), 'RESULT' from test"
>
> Start
> client -> IB, 12 bytes
> + 065 ms
> IB -> client, 32 bytes
> + 000 ms
> client -> IB, 8 bytes
> + 050 ms
> IB -> client, 32 bytes
> + 000 ms
> client -> IB, 80 bytes with the query text
> + 059 ms
> IB -> client, 64 bytes
> + 000 ms
> client -> IB, 24 bytes
> + 049 ms
> IB -> client, 40 bytes
> + 000 ms
> client -> IB, 32 bytes
> + 083 ms
> IB -> client, 236 bytes, most of it is zero and there is a text
> "COUNT" twice
> + 000 ms
> client -> IB, 32 bytes
> + 110 ms
> IB -> client, 408 bytes, most of it is zero and there is a text
> "COUNT" twice
> + 000 ms
> client -> IB, 24 bytes
> + 048 ms
> IB -> client, 32 bytes
> + 000 ms
> client -> IB, 28 bytes
> + 058 ms
> IB -> client, 32 bytes
> + 000 ms
> client -> IB, 40 bytes
> + 084 ms
> IB -> client, 40 bytes with the text "RESULT"
>
> The total query time is 606 ms.
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
And additionally:
When I do remote backup (using service manager) with verbose output 30
MEGABYTES data was transmitted to the client who made the backup. The
database was 1.1M, its backup is 160 k.
I used IBConsole.
What the hell this is? Do we really need the huge amount zeros to be
transmitted?
I checked the Microsoft SQL server protocol. It has the same result
as the
MySQL and PostgreSQL. Only the Interbase is slow.
Viktor
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
ib-support-unsubscribe@egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/