Subject | Re: [ib-support] IN clause, limitation to 1550 items |
---|---|
Author | Lucas Franzen |
Post date | 2003-03-15T21:43:30Z |
Daniel Rail schrieb:
Even if the limitation would be increased as well for the IN clause as
for the SQL statement size it would be still be a limit.
So changing the access to an unlimited structure within SQL access (as
Alan and Adrian suggested) is the better way to solve things like this.
Just my 2c.
Luc.
> > Is this limitation is the same with Firebird ?And in addition to that:
>
> Yes, the limitation is still there. There have been some talks amongst
> the Firebird developers on how to increase it, but they're not
> conclusive at the moment. Also, if you didn't know, an SQL statement
> can only be at the most 32K characters. It's a limitation at the
> moment. Also, it is possible to have multiple IN clauses in a query,
> up to the statement size limitation.
Even if the limitation would be increased as well for the IN clause as
for the SQL statement size it would be still be a limit.
So changing the access to an unlimited structure within SQL access (as
Alan and Adrian suggested) is the better way to solve things like this.
Just my 2c.
Luc.