Subject Re: [firebird-support] Oracle vs Firebird Technical Comparison
Author Daniel Rail

At December 28, 2003, 09:50, Elmar Haneke wrote:
>> The project, which we are fighting for, has estimated data volume
>> 500 MB to 1 GB and will have dedicated Unix/Linux/W2k sever with 15
>> Nodes in a LAN

I have customers with over 25 concurrent connections and no slow down
with Firebird 1.5.

> When the server itself is to be distributed on 15 Machines I
> would assume Oracle to be the winner.

At the present time Firebird can't be installed in a clustered
environment, but it is planned for FB 2.0.

Best regards,
Daniel Rail
Senior System Engineer
ACCRA Group Inc. (
ACCRA Med Software Inc. (