Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Oracle vs Firebird Technical Comparison |
---|---|
Author | Daniel Rail |
Post date | 2003-12-28T17:13:26Z |
Hi,
At December 28, 2003, 09:50, Elmar Haneke wrote:
with Firebird 1.5.
environment, but it is planned for FB 2.0.
--
Best regards,
Daniel Rail
Senior System Engineer
ACCRA Group Inc. (www.accra.ca)
ACCRA Med Software Inc. (www.filopto.com)
At December 28, 2003, 09:50, Elmar Haneke wrote:
>> The project, which we are fighting for, has estimated data volumeI have customers with over 25 concurrent connections and no slow down
>> 500 MB to 1 GB and will have dedicated Unix/Linux/W2k sever with 15
>> Nodes in a LAN
with Firebird 1.5.
> When the server itself is to be distributed on 15 Machines IAt the present time Firebird can't be installed in a clustered
> would assume Oracle to be the winner.
environment, but it is planned for FB 2.0.
--
Best regards,
Daniel Rail
Senior System Engineer
ACCRA Group Inc. (www.accra.ca)
ACCRA Med Software Inc. (www.filopto.com)