Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: Question about PLANs |
---|---|
Author | Marco Bommeljé |
Post date | 2003-12-08T10:57:57Z |
Hi Arno,
In the explanation below, you mention forcing NO PLAN:
need to do this or is it implicit? I am aware that a PLAN can be included in
trigger/proc code since Fb1.5, but I see no reference to NO PLAN option.
Cheers,
Marco
In the explanation below, you mention forcing NO PLAN:
>>If the plan can change frequently (Because the contents of the tablesCan you explain this some more? How do I force NO PLAN for stored procs? Do I
>>> will change continuously), this statement shouldn't be used inside a
>>> Stored Procedure. AFAIK, the plan will be defined when the SP is
>>> created and, in this case, the selected plan couldn't be the most
>>> adequate. Is this correct ?
>
>
> No, when NO PLAN is forced in the Stored Procedure then the PLAN is
> calculated before execute and this is what you always want.
need to do this or is it implicit? I am aware that a PLAN can be included in
trigger/proc code since Fb1.5, but I see no reference to NO PLAN option.
Cheers,
Marco