Subject | Re: [ib-support] Why OODBMS never toppled RDBMS |
---|---|
Author | Martijn Tonies |
Post date | 2002-08-07T10:36:21Z |
Some more reading on the subject...
http://searchdatabase.techtarget.com/tip/1,289483,sid13_gci769023,00.html
and
http://www.dbazine.com/pascal3.html
Martijn Tonies
InterBase Workbench - the developer tool for InterBase and Firebird
http://www.interbaseworkbench.com
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com
"This is an object-oriented system.
If we change anything, the users object."
http://searchdatabase.techtarget.com/tip/1,289483,sid13_gci769023,00.html
and
http://www.dbazine.com/pascal3.html
Martijn Tonies
InterBase Workbench - the developer tool for InterBase and Firebird
http://www.interbaseworkbench.com
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com
"This is an object-oriented system.
If we change anything, the users object."
>
> Not quite on topic, but it does follow a thread from last week.
>
> Why did Object-oriented database systems never catch on? This is
> SAP's take on it, but makes sense:
>
> http://www.sapdb.org/pdf/backsapdb_eng.pdf
>
> The argument is that the app server middle tier became the thing that
> handles the complexity, eliminating the need for overly feature-
> burdoned OODBMS.