Subject | Re: Limit selection + firebird stability |
---|---|
Author | csswa |
Post date | 2002-05-25T09:57:48Z |
--- In ib-support@y..., "nk_111" <nk@t...> wrote:
select first 10 * from table_name
This returns records 1-10 (i.e. top ten) of your set
You can also use SKIP, e.g.
select first 10 skip 5 * from table_name
This returns records 6-15 (i.e. top ten after skipping first 5) of
your set.
Firebird crashes when it is used outside recommended guidelines, like
using suspect UDFs or writing your own API stuff without thorough
debugging. While FB/IB is robust and stable (it is over 15 years
old, after all) there are ways to crash it, same as any other DBMS.
However IB/FB has always taken the approach that data integrity comes
first. So don't for a second think that FB is unstable or untested
or unproven. Until you can verify this with your own experience have
a look at ibphoenix.com, or in the group database links table, and
read up on its history and case examples.
Regards,
Andrew Ferguson
-- He who dies with the most slogans wins.
> in MSSql:reference, but dont find answers there.
> "select top 10 * from table_name"
>
> what is the similar syntax in firebird? I've read Interbase6.0 SQL
select first 10 * from table_name
This returns records 1-10 (i.e. top ten) of your set
You can also use SKIP, e.g.
select first 10 skip 5 * from table_name
This returns records 6-15 (i.e. top ten after skipping first 5) of
your set.
> 2.might be a silly question since there are references of
> how stable is firebird right now? both in Linux and Windows. this
> firebird users in ibphoenix.com. but, when I surf this mailinglistarchieve for a while, there are topics about firebird crash
> and some problem arises. so, i need another opinion or suggestionin which area firebird can/can't be used.
Firebird crashes when it is used outside recommended guidelines, like
using suspect UDFs or writing your own API stuff without thorough
debugging. While FB/IB is robust and stable (it is over 15 years
old, after all) there are ways to crash it, same as any other DBMS.
However IB/FB has always taken the approach that data integrity comes
first. So don't for a second think that FB is unstable or untested
or unproven. Until you can verify this with your own experience have
a look at ibphoenix.com, or in the group database links table, and
read up on its history and case examples.
Regards,
Andrew Ferguson
-- He who dies with the most slogans wins.