Subject | Re: Feature Request for FB 2.0 |
---|---|
Author | mmenaz |
Post date | 2002-05-04T17:08:32Z |
If I recall correctly, the original issue was about adding domain in trigger/stored procedure parameters and variables.
In the Firebird_v1_OpenFeatures.html file I've found:
446246 Domain for SP parameters Feature request
Allow domains to be used in the definition of the input/output parameters of SPs.
446245 Domain for Trigger/SP variables Feature request
Allow domains to be applied to variables within a trigger or SP.
So those issues are under "feature request" somewhere. Should they be on the FB sourgeforce site too? If so, could you add them, please?
Regards
Marco Menardi
In the Firebird_v1_OpenFeatures.html file I've found:
446246 Domain for SP parameters Feature request
Allow domains to be used in the definition of the input/output parameters of SPs.
446245 Domain for Trigger/SP variables Feature request
Allow domains to be applied to variables within a trigger or SP.
So those issues are under "feature request" somewhere. Should they be on the FB sourgeforce site too? If so, could you add them, please?
Regards
Marco Menardi
--- In ib-support@y..., "Artur Anjos" <arsoft@n...> wrote:
> Now that we have lots of money what was the 'new feature request'?
>
> As I notice, there was no post on firebird-architect or either in the bug
> tracker....
>
> hehehe. We spend too much time discussing this, and the person give up !
>
> Oh Yes, we create a burocratic way of requesting new features! But we have
> lots of cents!
>
> Artur
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Daniel Rail" <daniel@a...>
> To: <ib-support@y...>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 10:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [ib-support] Feature Request for FB 2.0
>
>
> > At 04/30/2002 06:46 PM, you wrote:
> > >I'm just saying that we have a Version 1 now, and I hope these will
> attract
> > >much more developers to Firebird. Of course Sean could not do this just
> for
> > >himself, and we are here to help. But discussing it first will give much
> > >more details to post in the bug tracker, and I think it will be nice to
> all.
> >
> > Artur,
> >
> > I totally agree. And, I think that discussions on new features should be
> > done in IB-Architect, since it would be more appropriate.
> >
> > Just to add my 2 cents to yours.
> >
> >
> > Daniel Rail
> > Senior System Engineer
> > ACCRA Group Inc. (www.accra.ca)
> > ACCRA Med Software Inc. (www.accramed.ca)
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > ADVERTISEMENT
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > ib-support-unsubscribe@e...
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
> >
> >