Subject | Re: [ib-support] Hardware, OS and performance |
---|---|
Author | Daniel Rail |
Post date | 2002-04-20T03:55:47Z |
At 04/20/2002 12:30 AM, you wrote:
average 5 client connections, for now.
physical resources as Windows. Try to get a fast hard drive(7200+ RPM,
15,000 RPM exists with sizes up to 36GB, if larger is required there are
some at 10,000 RPM), and you can either go with IDE ATA-100(or faster) or
SCSI, which ever fits the budget. Memory, I think 256MB would be enough,
but someone could correct me if I'm wrong. Multi-processor doesn't make
much of a difference for Super Server version, unless on Windows where you
can set Firebird to run on Processor No.2 and let Windows mainly use
Processor No.1. Make sure that the anti-virus is not checking the file
extensions used for the database. Also, if the Firebird server ends up on
a Windows XP machine or Windows .NET server(beta 3 is out), make sure that
you don't use .gdb as an extension, since it's monitored by the system
restore feature (we got a response of 10-20% increase in performance from
our clients after doing so). Also, the performance could be slowed down by
a slow network. So, if you can get a 100Mbit or 1Gbit network and make
sure that all the computers are properly setup for optimum usage of the
network.
just so you don't have to deal with multiple files.
IMPORTANT: The other major performance impact will depend on the structure
of your database and queries.
Daniel Rail
Senior System Engineer
ACCRA Group Inc. (www.accra.ca)
ACCRA Med Software Inc. (www.accramed.ca)
>Hi allNot everybody in this list has experienced what you are asking. My clients
>
>About half a month ago I already posted a similar question.
>Suprisingly I didn't get a lot of response although I expected it to
>be a question of broader interest/experience. Now I give it another try.
average 5 client connections, for now.
>I'm curious to know what kind of configuration gets the most powerfullLinux would be an excellent choice, since it doesn't consume as much
>Firebird installation. Are there significant differents within the
>operting systems supported by Firebird (WIN/LINUX/SOLARIS...)? Which
>is the most powerfull hardware nowaddays available? What's most
>beneficially from server hardware configuration point of view (disk?
>memory?,???).
physical resources as Windows. Try to get a fast hard drive(7200+ RPM,
15,000 RPM exists with sizes up to 36GB, if larger is required there are
some at 10,000 RPM), and you can either go with IDE ATA-100(or faster) or
SCSI, which ever fits the budget. Memory, I think 256MB would be enough,
but someone could correct me if I'm wrong. Multi-processor doesn't make
much of a difference for Super Server version, unless on Windows where you
can set Firebird to run on Processor No.2 and let Windows mainly use
Processor No.1. Make sure that the anti-virus is not checking the file
extensions used for the database. Also, if the Firebird server ends up on
a Windows XP machine or Windows .NET server(beta 3 is out), make sure that
you don't use .gdb as an extension, since it's monitored by the system
restore feature (we got a response of 10-20% increase in performance from
our clients after doing so). Also, the performance could be slowed down by
a slow network. So, if you can get a 100Mbit or 1Gbit network and make
sure that all the computers are properly setup for optimum usage of the
network.
>The application I'm running will be accessed by about 50 user at aGet the 64-bit I/O version of Firebird Super Server(Windows and Linux),
>time. Around 40 connections are not very active and will only do
>reading (call center stuff), 10 connections will be rather busy one
>(administration stuff). The size of the database is expected to be in
>GB-Range (6-10 GB).
just so you don't have to deal with multiple files.
IMPORTANT: The other major performance impact will depend on the structure
of your database and queries.
Daniel Rail
Senior System Engineer
ACCRA Group Inc. (www.accra.ca)
ACCRA Med Software Inc. (www.accramed.ca)