""Martijn Tonies"" <martijn@...> wrote in message
news:AD68463820C3A649B87A6D19025FEBE2619C@......

> Seems that my code in InterBase Workbench, where I had to go to great
> length to get the exact types :) - is reporting the same as isql... Is
> that good? *g*

Is only good if you agree to the IBO metadata extraction component that I
wrote initially, that Jason spiced up and that Geoff finally mutated into
Dbak.
:-)
Sincerely, I hope that such component doesn't mangle the order of charsets,
defaults, constraints and collations as isql does in some cases when
extracting metadata. A field declaration in the wrong order is rejected by
the engine.

C.
--
Claudio Valderrama C. - http://www.cvalde.com - http://www.firebirdSql.org
Independent developer
Owner of the Interbase® WebRing