On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 22:34:24 -0400 "Claudio Valderrama C." <cvalde@...>
wrote:

> > For backward compatibility, you'd have to leave isc_decode_sql_date()

as

> > is, but perhaps a new function that actually returns the correct

values

> > might be in order?
>
> The correct values? Those are the correct values for tm.
> Year is represented as calendar year minus 1900 and month is zero based.

I stand corrected. The header file I looked at wasn't commented. Thanks
for showing me the light.

Regards