Subject | Re: [ib-support] Firebird vs. IBConsole |
---|---|
Author | Ann W. Harrison |
Post date | 2002-03-22T16:56:33Z |
At 11:17 AM 3/22/2002 +0100, Bernhard Doebler wrote:
now insists that ambiguous field names in a join be qualified. Both
RDB$INDICES and RDB$INDEX_SEGMENTS include a field called RDB$INDEX_NAME.
Firebird insists on knowing which value of RDB$INDEX_NAME should be
returned. In all likelihood, the comparison is
RDB$INDEX_NAME = RDB$INDEX_NAME, so the two values are the same.
However, at the point where the ambiguity is determined, the higher
level semantics of the query are unavailable.
Regards,
Ann
www.ibphoenix.com
We have answers.
>Hi,No, there's something wrong with IBConsole - big surprise. Firebird
>
>I want to use IBConsole against a Firebird database.
>When I want to list the Indexes I get the error "Ambigous filed name
>between table RDB$INDICES and table RDB$INDEX_SEGMENTS RDB$INDEX_NAME"
>
>Is there something left out in Firebird?
now insists that ambiguous field names in a join be qualified. Both
RDB$INDICES and RDB$INDEX_SEGMENTS include a field called RDB$INDEX_NAME.
Firebird insists on knowing which value of RDB$INDEX_NAME should be
returned. In all likelihood, the comparison is
RDB$INDEX_NAME = RDB$INDEX_NAME, so the two values are the same.
However, at the point where the ambiguity is determined, the higher
level semantics of the query are unavailable.
Regards,
Ann
www.ibphoenix.com
We have answers.