Subject Re: [ib-support] OIT question
Author Jason Chapman (JAC2)
""Nick Upson"" <uebridger@...> wrote in message
news:F1060UzU2ZcF9KdzDB5000153a2@......
> why, when there are no active connections, is there a difference
> between the oldest and next transactions.
>
>
> Oldest transaction 682
Oldest uncommited transactions (limbo, rolled back, active)
> Oldest active 683
Oldest active transactions (active only)
> Next transaction 716
self explanatory

As the sweep is the only thing that will get rid of rolled back
transactions, then there is likely to be a difference.

Also I believe that it is the start transaction that clears up the TIP
(Transaction information page?).

Plus for you to get info from the TIP, I'm guessing that the tool that gets
ut starts its own transaction.

My 2c.

JAC.