Subject | Re: [ib-support] bug ? |
---|---|
Author | Duilio Foschi |
Post date | 2002-02-12T14:01:15Z |
Daniel,
There is a politically correct way to change a field attribute ?
When doing it, can one dress causally or is a necktie de-rigour ? :)
If fields attributes are stored in RDB$RELATION_FIELDS, I expect to get
logic results when I change the table.
Can you quote public documents that advice against touching system tables ?
For what I know, Interbase WorkBench, Marathon and surely QuickDesk: all
these tools routinely change fields in system tables in order to get quick
results.
Of course if you want to suggest a method that will work when compared to a
method that does not work, I take that you are confirming a bug in FB ...
Thank you
Duilio
>The proper way to change it is to create a temp field with the desiredI am puzzled.
>properties...
There is a politically correct way to change a field attribute ?
When doing it, can one dress causally or is a necktie de-rigour ? :)
If fields attributes are stored in RDB$RELATION_FIELDS, I expect to get
logic results when I change the table.
Can you quote public documents that advice against touching system tables ?
For what I know, Interbase WorkBench, Marathon and surely QuickDesk: all
these tools routinely change fields in system tables in order to get quick
results.
Of course if you want to suggest a method that will work when compared to a
method that does not work, I take that you are confirming a bug in FB ...
Thank you
Duilio