Subject | RE: [ib-support] Features and Comparisons to PostgreSQL |
---|---|
Author | Shane Vincent |
Post date | 2002-12-14T17:26:18Z |
I think that there should be nested transactions. Having nested
transactions allows users to write classes that can use transactions,
without other developers who might interface to the class breaking the
class by having a transaction of their own.
Just my thoughts.
Shane Vincent
-----Original Message-----
From: David Jencks [mailto:davidjencks@...]
Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 8:38 AM
To: ib-support@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [ib-support] Features and Comparisons to PostgreSQL
transactions allows users to write classes that can use transactions,
without other developers who might interface to the class breaking the
class by having a transaction of their own.
Just my thoughts.
Shane Vincent
-----Original Message-----
From: David Jencks [mailto:davidjencks@...]
Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 8:38 AM
To: ib-support@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [ib-support] Features and Comparisons to PostgreSQL
On 2002.12.14 08:34:17 -0500 Pavel Cisar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just few corrections to otherwise very precise Danile's answer...
>
> On 14 Dec 2002 at 8:48, Daniel Rail wrote:
>
> > > 1. Concurrent Transactions
>
> > If this means more than one transaction per connection, then yes.
> > But, if this means a transaction within another one, then no. FB
1.5
> > will support SAVE POINTS which is part of SQL-99.
>
> IB/FB uses the same multigenerational architecture as PostgreSQL
> (actually, IB has it first). You have concurrent transactions in read
> committed, repeatable read and serializable isolation levels (no dirty
> read) with option to precisely specify the access level to individual
> tables (table reservation). Multiple independent transactions per
> connection. No nested transactions. Support for savepoints in FB 1.5.
>
> > > 4. Unicode support
>
> > Yes it does. The only place where it's not fully supported and it's
> > when creating your WHERE clause, Firebird has a hard time coping
with
> > the special characters in the search string. Other than that, it
> > works.
>
> ??? You can specify a character set for literals.
>
> > > 5. Schemas
>
> Namespaces ? No, but it's planned feature.
>
> > > 7. Cancel a query asynchronously
>
> Not in FB, but in IB since v6.5
>
> > > 8. Boolean field
> > It's being talked about and a possibility for FB 1.5(I can't say for
> > sure)
>
> You can easily substitute it with domains. Direct support for boolean
> datatype is in IB 7 and it's in FB 1.5
>
> > > 10. User defined types
> > FB has domains. But, if this means that the user could define a
> > datatype that is non-existent in FB, i.e. GUID, then no.
>
> No support for user defined operators etc. like in PostgreSQL.
>
> > > 13. Functions for default value of columns
> > Not that I'm aware of.
>
> Just literals, but you can use before insert triggers for that
purpose.
>
> > > 14. Regular expression support
> > Yes. You use the LIKE in your WHERE clause.
>
> Wildcard masks with LIKE operator, but no regular expressions (yet).
>
> > > 16. LIMIT keyword
> > FB has the FIRST keyword to limit the number of rows returns.
>
> Yep, FIRST and SKIP, even in subqueries.
>
> > > 18. Indexes on functions
> > Yes it's possible. You specify the position of the returned column
in
> > your ORDER BY.
>
> You probably mean expression indices. No, they are not (yet)
supported.
>
> But don't forget FB advantages over PostgreSQL:
>
> - more compact server (1.5MB), smaller footprint
> - almost zero configuration and maintenance
> - process per client (classic) and thread per client (superserver)
> architecture (PG has just classic).
> - internal garbage collection thread (no external VACUUM)
> - far better Windows port :-)
> - embedded server
> - far better than PG for scalable vertical solutions (from personal
PDA
> to SMP servers handling 3000 concurrent users)
> - 15+ years of successful world-wide usage in enterprise and mission-
> critical solutions
> - selectable stored procedures (yep, PG 7.3 got them too)
> - much better user's and developer's community :-)
You left out
full two phase commit support, and with JayBird, nearly full XA
transaction
support
david jencks
>
> Best regards
> Pavel Cisar
> http://www.ibphoenix.com
> For all your upto date Firebird and
> InterBase information
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> ib-support-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
ib-support-unsubscribe@egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/