Subject | Re: [ib-support] malloc / free_it questions (was: Using UDF: "ConnectionLost to Database") |
---|---|
Author | Frank Ingermann |
Post date | 2002-11-10T16:28:08Z |
Hello Raymond,
Raymond Kennington wrote:
whether or not it might be outdated for Firebird - and i do trust Frank
(no, not myself, the other one<g>) when he writes something like this, as he is
an experienced fb devel - as you may recall, he was the one that found the
backdoor in IB6!)
cheers,
fingerman
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
when parsers parse, and compilers compile, then why don't objects object?
fingerbirdy - fingerman's door to Firebird
http://www.fingerbird.de
Raymond Kennington wrote:
> This is a deprecated technique. Frank Ingermann quoted the following documentation:note that i found this in a knowledgebase article, and i don't know
>
> "<quote from doc0593.htm>
> 3)RETURNS PARAMETER N: Use this argument to the DECLARE EXTERNAL FUNCTION state
> ment
> that specifies that the return value for the UDF is stored in the input paramet
> er N. This feature has
> been deprecated and was not certified under 5.x; it was by accident that it was
> documented in the manuals."
>
whether or not it might be outdated for Firebird - and i do trust Frank
(no, not myself, the other one<g>) when he writes something like this, as he is
an experienced fb devel - as you may recall, he was the one that found the
backdoor in IB6!)
cheers,
fingerman
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
when parsers parse, and compilers compile, then why don't objects object?
fingerbirdy - fingerman's door to Firebird
http://www.fingerbird.de