Subject | Re: [ib-support] Upgrading from IB6.0 to FB1.0 |
---|---|
Author | Svein Erling Tysvaer |
Post date | 2002-10-16T08:02:01Z |
At 06:28 16.10.2002 +0000, you wrote:
introduced in IB 6.0.1 or 6.5) SELECT FIRST ... SKIP ...
that in a production environment until you feel pretty confident your FB
version works equally well. Having said that, I doubt you will get into
much trouble upgrading to FB. We went from IB 5.6 to FB 0.9.4 without much
fuss at all (though our system isn't very complicated). Basically, I think
FB1 is a lot of bug fixes (some which may break existing code like
ambiguous queries) and whether you go IB -> FB1 -> FB2 or wait and go
directly IB -> FB2 would probably make little difference - it's like
whether you should carry all three bags with you in one go or go twice.
Set
>My Questions.Slightly different syntax for (I think, though uncertain whether it was
>
>Are there any hidden issues I will come across by anyone else's
>experience of doing such an upgrade? I am aware there may be one or
>two new reserved words ( knowing my luck I will have them in some
>primary key ! ) and things like ambiguous querys not allowed ( that
>should be sorted out anyway ) are there any other things I should
>prepare myself for ( that may not be obvious on first use ) ?
introduced in IB 6.0.1 or 6.5) SELECT FIRST ... SKIP ...
>ANDYou shouldn't release any system untested. If it works fine in IB6.0, use
>
>My system is fairly stable on IB6.0 should I not wait out for
>FB2.0 ?
that in a production environment until you feel pretty confident your FB
version works equally well. Having said that, I doubt you will get into
much trouble upgrading to FB. We went from IB 5.6 to FB 0.9.4 without much
fuss at all (though our system isn't very complicated). Basically, I think
FB1 is a lot of bug fixes (some which may break existing code like
ambiguous queries) and whether you go IB -> FB1 -> FB2 or wait and go
directly IB -> FB2 would probably make little difference - it's like
whether you should carry all three bags with you in one go or go twice.
Set