Subject | Re: [ib-support] FOR UPDATE clause |
---|---|
Author | Marcos Vinicius Dufloth |
Post date | 2001-08-17T17:17:33Z |
From: "Ivan Prenosil" <prenosil@...>
To: <ib-support@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:04 AM
Subject: Re: [ib-support] FOR UPDATE clause
You're right. :o)
pessimistic lock I learned more some things about. Here we say "living and
learning". :o)
Regards from Brazil.
Dufloth.
To: <ib-support@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:04 AM
Subject: Re: [ib-support] FOR UPDATE clause
> Considering that Oracle is not following SQL standard in such basic thinglike JOIN ...
You're right. :o)
> Interbase does not lock rows with "select ... for update" statement.I need yet learn a bit more about IB architecture. Searching mers about
> SQL92 does not require it either. (iirc explanation from Diane Brown).
> I would prefer to follow SQL standard rather than Oracle/Gates.
pessimistic lock I learned more some things about. Here we say "living and
learning". :o)
Regards from Brazil.
Dufloth.