Subject | Re: [ib-support] Re IB security |
---|---|
Author | Paul Reeves |
Post date | 2001-08-01T19:51:47Z |
lobolo2000 wrote:
procedures' I thought you meant there was more than one.
This particular one is not really much of a plague - those that have
come across it have a work around, and most people do not seem to be
having a problem with it. For instance, I believe it is the first time
it has been mentioned on this list, and I don't recall a bug having been
logged for it on the Firebird project.
I'm glad you have mentioned this because we can now get it logged and
fixed.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
taking InterBase further
>Ah, yes. That one. When you talked about 'bugs plaguing stored
> Clippings from the IBObjects site about this bug:
>
> "The SQLDA bug"
> This is the infamous bug in InterBase itself.
> .....the InterBase bug that mainly shows itself with executing stored
> procedures from remote clients....
> Some people were complaining that their stored procedures were being
> executed twice and messing things up.
> ....The work-around is to put a SUSPEND in the stored procedure ....
>
procedures' I thought you meant there was more than one.
This particular one is not really much of a plague - those that have
come across it have a work around, and most people do not seem to be
having a problem with it. For instance, I believe it is the first time
it has been mentioned on this list, and I don't recall a bug having been
logged for it on the Firebird project.
I'm glad you have mentioned this because we can now get it logged and
fixed.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
taking InterBase further