Subject | Re: [ib-support] Changes to check on |
---|---|
Author | Bill Katelis |
Post date | 2001-07-09T03:53:35Z |
Ann,
Should we fix these as a matter of urgency .... or when convenient ...?
thanks
bill
"Ann W. Harrison" wrote:
Should we fix these as a matter of urgency .... or when convenient ...?
thanks
bill
"Ann W. Harrison" wrote:
> In the course of chasing down a bug, I realized that a number
> of indexes in the system tables which should be unique are not.
> I've changed that. The indexes affected are
>
> index RDB$INDEX_1 for RDB$RELATIONS on RDB$RELATION_ID
>
> index RDB$INDEX_14 for RDB$CHECK_CONSTRAINTS on RDB$CONSTRAINT_NAME
>
> compound index RDB$INDEX_16 for RDB$FORMATS on RDB$RELATION_ID and
> RDB$FORMAT
>
> index RDB$INDEX_22 for RDB$PROCEDURES on RDB$PROCEDURE_ID
>
> index RDB$INDEX_24 for RDB$EXCEPTIONS on RDB$EXCEPTION_NUMBER
>
> index RDB$INDEX_36 for RDB$FIELD_DIMENSIONS on RDB$FIELD_NAME
>
> You might just check that your databases generally follow those
> rules.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ann
> www.ibphoenix.com
> We have answers.
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> ib-support-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/