Subject | RE: [ib-support] One-to-one relationship |
---|---|
Author | Nico Callewaert |
Post date | 2001-05-16T07:26:41Z |
Thanks Dietrich
Nico
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Dietrich Schulten [mailto:ibo@...]
Verzonden: woensdag 16 mei 2001 9:16
Aan: ib-support@yahoogroups.com
Onderwerp: Re: [ib-support] One-to-one relationship
Hi Nico,
"Nico Callewaert" <ncw@...> schrieb:
to have the supertype in one table and the additional attributes of the
subtype in a second, dependent table that relates 1:1 to the first.
D.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
ib-support-unsubscribe@egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Nico
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Dietrich Schulten [mailto:ibo@...]
Verzonden: woensdag 16 mei 2001 9:16
Aan: ib-support@yahoogroups.com
Onderwerp: Re: [ib-support] One-to-one relationship
Hi Nico,
"Nico Callewaert" <ncw@...> schrieb:
> Hi list,in
> Can someone explain to me what is the advantage of a one-to-one
> relationship ? I don't see any advantage on it, because a single record
> the first table is related to only one record in the second table, so whyFor instance, if you have a subtype-kind of relationship, it makes sense
> don't put it all in one table then ?
to have the supertype in one table and the additional attributes of the
subtype in a second, dependent table that relates 1:1 to the first.
D.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
ib-support-unsubscribe@egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/