Subject | Re: [ib-support] IN limitation to 1500 ? |
---|---|
Author | Roberto de Amorim |
Post date | 2001-12-28T11:09:56Z |
ok,
you may do like Paul Schmidt told before... using a JOIN
SELECT fields FROM table1
INNER JOIN table2 on table1.value = table2.value
it will be fastest than IN ...
(when you use a JOIN, you are NOT obligated to select some fields from other
table...)
you may do like Paul Schmidt told before... using a JOIN
SELECT fields FROM table1
INNER JOIN table2 on table1.value = table2.value
it will be fastest than IN ...
(when you use a JOIN, you are NOT obligated to select some fields from other
table...)
> The user make a select and can also put a filter on the result dataset,the
> then I have to select all records of a detail table it's here that come
> in statement.and
>
> select from detail_table where id in (.......)
>
> This IN statement is not gracious I know, but this code was already made
> was working with Oracle and MsSQL.
>