Subject | Re: Generator RDB$SECURITY |
---|---|
Author | rogervellacott |
Post date | 2001-12-13T12:05:23Z |
While we're on the subject of generators, what about this
SQL$DEFAULT? Might it not be better to name it RDB$SQL_DEFAULT to
maintain the naming convention for system tables?
SQL$DEFAULT? Might it not be better to name it RDB$SQL_DEFAULT to
maintain the naming convention for system tables?
--- In ib-support@y..., Paul Reeves <paul@f...> wrote:
> Roger Vellacott wrote:
> >
> > Using FB RC1
> >
> > I have a database which Validates ok, backs up ok, but on
restore, at the
> > last moment, reports an attempt to insert a duplicate value in a
unique
> > index. The index in question turns out to be the index on the
Generator
> > table. It also turns out that the database has a generator called
> > RDB$SECURITY, which is not present when a database is created
from scratch.
> >
>
> I believe this is something that sneaked in around the time of RC1.
It also
> looks as if it has snuck out again. Later builds don't do this.
>
> Paul
> --
>
> Paul Reeves
> http://www.ibphoenix.com
> taking InterBase further