Subject Re: [ib-support] Idea for a new field type for FB 2,0 or IB 7?
Author Claudio Valderrama C.
"Nando Dessena" <nandod@...> wrote in message
news:3BFBB915.CE6C07FD@......
>
> This is absolutely required, and perhaps Jason's suggestion was directed
> towards this. I could even accept the engine overwriting anything I
> could have put in (so, no test for null), but it must give me back the
> values.

We can borrow the idea from MsSQL, whether good or bad: we keep the latest
implicit generator's value retrieved in the internal request and implement a
new item in the isc_database_info API call to get this value. Now, it's the
responsability of the application to retrieve the latest value with the API
call before another operation updates the latest saved value.

C.
--
Claudio Valderrama C. - http://www.cvalde.com - http://www.firebirdSql.org
Independent developer
Owner of the Interbase® WebRing