Subject | Re: [ib-support] Idea for a new field type for FB 2,0 or IB 7? |
---|---|
Author | Claudio Valderrama C. |
Post date | 2001-11-22T09:51:59Z |
"Nando Dessena" <nandod@...> wrote in message
news:3BFBB915.CE6C07FD@......
implicit generator's value retrieved in the internal request and implement a
new item in the isc_database_info API call to get this value. Now, it's the
responsability of the application to retrieve the latest value with the API
call before another operation updates the latest saved value.
C.
--
Claudio Valderrama C. - http://www.cvalde.com - http://www.firebirdSql.org
Independent developer
Owner of the Interbase® WebRing
news:3BFBB915.CE6C07FD@......
>We can borrow the idea from MsSQL, whether good or bad: we keep the latest
> This is absolutely required, and perhaps Jason's suggestion was directed
> towards this. I could even accept the engine overwriting anything I
> could have put in (so, no test for null), but it must give me back the
> values.
implicit generator's value retrieved in the internal request and implement a
new item in the isc_database_info API call to get this value. Now, it's the
responsability of the application to retrieve the latest value with the API
call before another operation updates the latest saved value.
C.
--
Claudio Valderrama C. - http://www.cvalde.com - http://www.firebirdSql.org
Independent developer
Owner of the Interbase® WebRing