Subject | Re: [ib-support] Classic & Superserver question |
---|---|
Author | Didier Gasser-Morlay |
Post date | 2001-11-19T22:04:37Z |
Helen,
So I obviously need to understand more. Can you point me to any doc
explaining the pro/cons of each architecture ? Linux IS a definitve option
so ...
Didier
Helen Borrie <helebor@...> wrote in message
news:4.2.0.58.20011117023112.018dd800@......
So I obviously need to understand more. Can you point me to any doc
explaining the pro/cons of each architecture ? Linux IS a definitve option
so ...
Didier
Helen Borrie <helebor@...> wrote in message
news:4.2.0.58.20011117023112.018dd800@......
> At 03:17 PM 16-11-01 +0000, you wrote:Classic for Windows since IB 4.1.
> >My current understanding of the difference between the two is that
> >the later is preferred when there are more than 1 processor in the
> >server.
> >
> >Am I right or wrong ?
>
> Wrong. Classic works OK on multiple processors - but there hasn't been a
>doesn't present any problems on Linux.
> Firebird has both Classic and Superserver for Linux but CPU affinity
>
> Helen
>
> All for Open and Open for All
> InterBase Developer Initiative � http://www.interbase2000.org
> _______________________________________________________
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> ib-support-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>