Subject Re: [ib-support] ISQL and NOT NULL fields
Author Ann W. Harrison
>""Ivan Prenosil"" <prenosil@...> wrote in message
> > Imagine you have corrupted database/table such that there are NULLs
> > in NOT NULL field ...
> > To show '0' or '' instead of '<null>' (like in current ISQL),
> > or to show null as '<null>' (like in WISQL ) ?

At 10:12 PM 11/7/2001 -0400, Claudio Valderrama C. wrote:

>I definitely prefer to detect, handle nulls and show them as <null> so no
>doubt is left. Maybe it should be an option.

I hate options, would prefer to see '<null>', but am really
not enthusiastic about improving ISQL but would rather see
us replace it with something better.


We have answers.