Subject | Re: [ib-support] ISQL and NOT NULL fields |
---|---|
Author | Claudio Valderrama C. |
Post date | 2001-11-08T02:12:37Z |
""Ivan Prenosil"" <prenosil@...> wrote in message
news:20011107171548.70E651504C@......
doubt is left. Maybe it should be an option.
C.
--
Claudio Valderrama C. - http://www.cvalde.com - http://www.firebirdSql.org
Independent developer
Owner of the Interbase® WebRing
news:20011107171548.70E651504C@......
> Imagine you have corrupted database/table such that there are NULLsI definitely prefer to detect, handle nulls and show them as <null> so no
> in NOT NULL field (e.g. when you add NOT NULL constraint to already
> populated table by updating system table).
>
>
> Which variant do you think is better for ISQL ?
> To show '0' or '' instead of '<null>' (like in current ISQL),
> or to show null as '<null>' (like in WISQL ) ?
doubt is left. Maybe it should be an option.
C.
--
Claudio Valderrama C. - http://www.cvalde.com - http://www.firebirdSql.org
Independent developer
Owner of the Interbase® WebRing