Subject | Re: [ib-support] Compression |
---|---|
Author | Artur Anjos |
Post date | 2001-10-29T23:10:05Z |
I have discuss this with Paul a few weeks ago, and I believe that for "long"
fetches (some reports with lot's of data, for example) the overhead for
Compress/Descompress isn't important, and compression should make a
difference on slow links.
I really don't like using a proxy, but I will be glad to see this on the
driver, not in a proxy.
Of course, we can use a router with compression....
Artur
fetches (some reports with lot's of data, for example) the overhead for
Compress/Descompress isn't important, and compression should make a
difference on slow links.
I really don't like using a proxy, but I will be glad to see this on the
driver, not in a proxy.
Of course, we can use a router with compression....
Artur
----- Original Message -----
From: "Leyne, Sean" <sleyne@...>
To: <ib-support@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 10:39 PM
Subject: RE: [ib-support] Compression
> Josce,
>
> The time savings you are seeing is not the result of data compression
> but rather the fact that the dataset is being built/collected locally
> and then sent over the wire.
>
> Thus, the normal row read/fetch exchange/conversation between the client
> and the server is occuring on the proxy server (ie. on the local
> network) without the normal delay of WAN/Internet based conversation.
>
> The same performance benefit will be seeing using any application server
> based solution, whether data compression is actually employed.
>
>
> Sean
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> ib-support-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>