Subject | Re: [ib-support] Server configuration |
---|---|
Author | Paul Reeves |
Post date | 2001-10-04T20:16:12Z |
guido.klapperich@... wrote:
to ibserver, NT appears to keep a copy in virtual ram. Every page read from
the databsae appears to lead to a page write to virtual memory.
Usually it isn't necessary.
to work. Although it may have some relevance if you have a lot of memory and a
lot of concurrent users. Each connection takes RAM over and above the Cache
allocation.
space hugely expensive. In most cases it can be made to perform adequately
within those constraints. Of course, in an ideal world it would be able to use
more memory and grind through to a solution more quickly. In the meantime, you
just have to think the problem through a bit better. So, the bottom line is
that your SP can be optimised to work better. Show us the code and we will see
if it can be made to crank out the answer in a more timely manner.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
taking InterBase further
>It is just a max value. It is complicated by the fact that even when allocated
> My DB has a Pagesize of 4096 and my page buffer is 8192, then my
> DB-Cache is 32 MB, right ? What does this mean exactly ? Does it mean,
> that at the first connection to the DB 32 MB will be reserved in the RAM
> or is the DB-Cache just a max Value ?
>
to ibserver, NT appears to keep a copy in virtual ram. Every page read from
the databsae appears to lead to a page write to virtual memory.
> I have seen, that all entries in my ibconfig are marked as comment, isYes. They are the defaults. Uncomment them and set new values if you wish.
> this normal ?
Usually it isn't necessary.
>Yeah, I have no idea why this stuff was ever documented. It has never seemed
> Has someone experience with the SERVER_WORKING_SIZE_MIN and
> SERVER_WORKING_SIZE_MAX parameters in the ibconfig ? I have set
> SERVER_WORKING_SIZE_MIN to 128 MB and SERVER_WORKING_SIZE_MAX to 512 MB,
> because I hoped, that IB will reserve 128 MB RAM at startup, but is
> doesn't.
to work. Although it may have some relevance if you have a lot of memory and a
lot of concurrent users. Each connection takes RAM over and above the Cache
allocation.
> The reason for my questions is the following: I have a SP, whichIB was written for an age when computers were slow, memory was tiny and disc
> execution takes more than a hour. While executing the SP IB permanently
> accesses the harddrive, but not more than 30 MB RAM are used by IB.
> Therefore I want to force IB to take more RAM, but I don't know, how to
> do so.
space hugely expensive. In most cases it can be made to perform adequately
within those constraints. Of course, in an ideal world it would be able to use
more memory and grind through to a solution more quickly. In the meantime, you
just have to think the problem through a bit better. So, the bottom line is
that your SP can be optimised to work better. Show us the code and we will see
if it can be made to crank out the answer in a more timely manner.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
taking InterBase further