Subject | Firebird and SQLAlchemy |
---|---|
Author | werner |
Post date | 2013-06-24T13:47:38Z |
Hi,
The other day an issue regarding "commit retaining" came up on the SA
list (sqlalchemy@...)
See the thread "The problem with Oldest transaction (Firebird)" and the
ticket Michael Bayer opened for it.
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/ticket/2763
I would think that the default should be "False" on this new flag and is
it is a change in behaviour I would say it should only go into 0.9.
What do other think who use either kinterbasdb or FDB with SA on this?
Werner
The other day an issue regarding "commit retaining" came up on the SA
list (sqlalchemy@...)
See the thread "The problem with Oldest transaction (Firebird)" and the
ticket Michael Bayer opened for it.
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/ticket/2763
I would think that the default should be "False" on this new flag and is
it is a change in behaviour I would say it should only go into 0.9.
What do other think who use either kinterbasdb or FDB with SA on this?
Werner