Subject Re: [firebird-python] What is the current status of kinterbasdb?
Author Pavel Cisar
Uwe,

As you may know, the KInterbasDB project is without maintainer, and
because Firebird project depends on it (for QA and other things), we
have to do something to ensure it's bright future. I have considered the
option to take over this project, but at the end we decided to fork it
under Firebird Project for next reasons:

1. KInterbasDB also supports InterBase, but we don't have necessary
expertise to maintain or even expand it's IB support (both products
divert from each other more and more with every new version). So if KDB
would be maintained by Firebird Project, the IB support would be
eventually dropped, which I would consider as unfair to current KDB users.

2. KInterbasDB is currently implemented as C extension library wrapped
in a pile of Python code. This arrangement puts significant difficulties
on any developer that would like provide it on various OS (Firebird runs
on more than Windows and Linux) and Python platforms (for example
IronPython, PyPy). The future of this project seems to be in complete
rewrite in pure Python that talks directly to Firebird using the wire
protocol instead using the client library, i.e. in the same way like
JayBird type 4 driver or .NET Provider driver works. So while we'll
maintain current KDB for some time, it will be eventually replaced with
completely new driver written from scratch, and although we'd like keep
it backward compatible, it's not necessary to do that. Hence it's
possible that next major version of KDB would be different product anyway.

In light of these arguments, we're about to start a new subproject under
Firebird Project for Firebird Python driver. This driver will have new
name and it's first version will be direct fork of KInterbasDB 3.2 (the
KInterbasDB is licensed under BSD-like license.) with our patches to
make it work with Firebird 2.1. We also have snapshots of KDB 3.3 that
adds significant new feature - support for multiple transactions in
single connection, which would make the basis for next version (it's
stable, but not thoroughly tested). This would be the last major version
that would build on KDB codebase. This subproject would be lead by me
(i.e. I will take the responsibility for its maintenance, testing,
release, website etc.), but I suppose that more developers would join in
future.

best regards
Pavel Cisar
Firebird Project QA Team

Uwe Grauer napsal(a):
> There were no news on kinterbasdb for a long time now.
> Can someone please give some information on the current status?
> Did someone take over kinterbasdb development?
>
> Since kinterbasdb isn't ready for firebird 2.1 and i have to use a
> testrelease of kinterbasbd 3.2 to be able to use it with Dabo
> (http://www.dabodev.com) i really would like to have some infos on the
> future of kinterbasdb support.
>
> I hope someone is reading this mailing list as there was almost no
> activity during the last year.
>
> Thanks,
> Uwe