Subject | Re: [firebird-php] Firebird, PHP on CentOS 5 again |
---|---|
Author | marius adrian popa |
Post date | 2009-05-20T09:11:06Z |
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Philippe Makowski
<makowski@...> wrote:
and better to write docs or blogs about firebird+php on various
linuxes or unixes
Also we have to write more tests for php driver
--
Join today Firebird Foundation http://www.firebirdsql.org/ff/foundation
<makowski@...> wrote:
>This is already an Off Toppic so i guess we can finish the thread here :)
>
> Lester Caine [09-05-20 07.16] :
>
>> I've just found a copy of the FHS rules, and actually it is quite clear
>> ... /opt SHOULD be used for additional software and each package should
>> be contained in it's own tree below /opt ... FHS simply does not provide
>> any rules as to why /usr should be used instead of /opt for additional
>> packages over those required by the kernel
> that's distro rules
> nothing else
>
> all Linux distro says :
> use /opt to install software that is not part of the distro
>
>> the package may be totally screwed up
>> with respect to a 'standard' FB install - as demonstrated by Fedora
>
> I disagree, it is not "totally screwed up"
> you get all under /usr/lib as if it was under /opt
>
> but real files are at their good location
> as for example %{_sysconfdir} for conf files
>
> if you build Firebird by yourself, you'd see that the default path is
> /usr/lib ;)
>
> and again, you have the choice
> use distro package, firebird project rpm, firbird project tar.gz, or build
> it yourself
>
> each of them have its advantage / disadvantage
and better to write docs or blogs about firebird+php on various
linuxes or unixes
Also we have to write more tests for php driver
>--
>
--
Join today Firebird Foundation http://www.firebirdsql.org/ff/foundation